7 workflows

runcastle

A single Claude Code agent reads the diff and commit history of your branch against its base, then writes a complete, reviewer-ready PR_DESCRIPTION.md — summary, what changed, why, testing, risk, and a reviewer checklist — grounded entirely in the real diff.

runcastle

Fans out an analyst agent per competitor to fetch and dissect each rival's site — pricing, positioning, messaging, gaps — then a strategist synthesizes the teardowns into a single positioning brief with sharp, defensible angles for your product.

runcastle

Reads a sources.md list of papers, fetches each one, and builds a structured literature review — per-source summary of question, method, finding, and limitation — then synthesizes the themes, disagreements, and open gaps across the whole set.

runcastle

An Opus planner triages your open `bug`-labelled GitHub issues into independent fixes, then a swarm of Sonnet fixers fans out — one per issue, each on its own branch — to reproduce, root-cause, patch, and test the bug in parallel.

runcastle

A single Claude Code agent turns an incident timeline and the last week of commit history into a blameless postmortem — summary, impact, timeline, root causes, contributing factors, what went well, and action items with owners and due dates — written to postmortem/POSTMORTEM.md.

runcastle

A single Claude Code agent reads the commits since your last tag, groups them into Added/Changed/Fixed/Security by user-facing intent, and writes a clean CHANGELOG.md entry plus a friendly RELEASE_NOTES.md — turning raw git history into release-ready notes in one pass.

runcastle

Fans out a searcher per sub-question to fetch and note public web sources, then an Opus synthesizer writes a fully cited report, then a Codex fact-checker adversarially verifies every claim against the notes and loops until the report holds up.